Lede:
In a punch to the virtual gut, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Epic Games, affirming a jury’s decision that Google’s Play Store is an illegal monopoly. This ruling asserts that Google used some questionable tactics to dominate the Android app environment, refusing to overturn previous conclusions.
Zooming In
The Roots of the Dispute:
This battle began in the heydays of mobile gaming, catalyzed by the sky-high popularity of Epic’s blockbuster, Fortnite. Developers, tired of the heavy 15% to 30% chunk taken by Apple and Google’s stores for in-app purchases, decided they had paid enough.
Back in 2020, Epic threw a curveball by rolling out its own payment system inside Fortnite, evading those steep fees. Apple’s response? Yanking the game from its store. Google didn’t waste time either, leading to lawsuits that questioned the very foundation of how app stores operate.
Trial Outcomes:
While Epic’s legal duel with Apple hit a dead end, they found traction against Google. By December 2023, a jury agreed that Google’s actions—restricting third-party app distribution and payment systems—smacked of anti-competitive behavior. Despite Android’s open-source claim, Google’s contractual ties with manufacturers and its grip on access to app markets made it the gatekeeper for Android apps.
Broader Implications:
This ruling demands Google open the Android playground to other app stores, potentially reshaping how consumers access software on their devices. By standing up to this decision, Google not only faces operational changes but also a looming threat of further regulations.
Big Tech argues these cases are too “complex” for juries. But a jury decided this case, and today, the Ninth Circuit backed them up.
Turns out Americans are more than up to the task of deciding when monopolists break the law. If the public bears the harm, we deserve the right to… https://t.co/rx2F0nL43V
– Hetal Doshi (@hetaljdoshi) July 31, 2025
Conclusion:
Epic’s win against Google signals a possible shift in how tech giants may have to conduct business. One thing is for sure, this isn’t just about digital courtrooms; it’s a prelude to changes in consumer access and the price tags attached.
